Less abstract Jung

Se: I literally see the actual person Jane in front of me.

Ni: Jane the person will literally do action x in the future.

Ne: Hypothetically what if Jane the person were an elephant in the hypothetical place Carrot Land?

Si: In the primitive sense I perceive the literal person Jane as an actual elephant in a literal city.

Fe: Jane the person likes carrots to eat and I know this.

Ti: x the concept is the derivative of the concept y

Te: to get the car to run then you must turn the key.

Fi: I Jane know that I personally like carrots.

Elon Musk dream

I was in a Walmart and met him. I told him I had an idea for nano-fabrication.

He said it was a good idea and it would revolutionize manufacturing.

pose

I had a dream last night that was highly sexual.
It was not lucid or tactile but this catgirl posed for me on a basketball rim.

it was blake belladonna

Jung Super Simplified

Se: I see Jane

Ni: Jane will do x

Ne: What if Jane were an elephant

Si: Jane is an elephant

Fe: Jane likes x

Ti: x is y

Te: to get x do y

Fi: I like x

Ressurection

Christianity now should be about preaching to secularists, not foreigners off in an entirely different belief context. If you do not understand what faith is, what the substance of belief is, it’s very difficult to understand the heritage of the modern world.

There’s a tendency for non-Christians to see Christianity as a unified religion, but that isn’t the case. If you think of it the other way, Christians sometimes have the tendency to look at irreligious people as a monolith too.

Why preach to anyone?

The only reason to is because you want immoral persons to become moral persons and Christianity is not about morality, it is not about ‘heritage’ it is not even about faith.

If you did not grow up understanding what a jew is or what Israel is or what happened to them you cannot just condense thousands of years of history into “Jesus loves you” and think you can convert people. You are trying to make people into one culture and that is not right. It is not even what the original “Christians” had in mind.

The gospel is not: Jesus loves you… It is that your death is not something to worry about. Jews in Jesus’ time were not a monolith either. Some thought spirits existed and some did not. They had a whole section of the temple devoted to those who did not believe in spirits, the secularists and Judaism is very secularised.

It is only the fanatics that take hold of this religion and spread it and that is why it has not died. The Jews were dispersed and they came back again and again. They as a people (the chosen people) cannot be destroyed. The book they have is what tells them who they are, a people who were persecuted and always returned.

What does Christianity have to do with this then? Jesus was resurrected and people early on told others they too would be resurrected. But this then was corrupted into that you must believe in Jesus or you would go to hell. Jews don’t even believe in hell. Hell is a metaphor for persecution. And the Greeks and Romans view the underworld as the unconscious or the unknown dark places.

It is only because Christians were persecuted that converts happened where people saw that it was wrong and then listened and then believed. Not that they believed in hell, they believed in resurrection.

And what happens after that is not what most believe, Jesus will not be on earth as a human. He will not live in a cube two thousand miles across. What will happen is that the wars will cease. Peace will be on earth, sickness and death will be gone. Not because of people preaching or anything but because of the metaphase that brought the earth to that point where the dominant kingdom rose up.

When the earth is full there can’t be war and violence. Destruction cannot happen. Simply because everything will be monitored. There will be no place to hide. Not a single thing will go unseen. Some call this technology antichrist, but it will stop the murders and the rape and the hunger. And those who were dead will come back, just not in the way people ignorantly thought they would.

Double Dunning-Kruger

At any peak in confidence, people do not realize they are at the top because of how successful they are. An example would be that someone at 155, even if at the genius level, has the lowest levels of confidence above 145. The reason is that they cannot find anyone above them and yet they yearn to be apreciated. All other people do not “get” them and they succumb to believe they are the peak themselves. This is not the case but as with no confidence, with no reinforcement from others, they latch onto the idea of superiority.

With confidence, a person does not have self-esteem issues so they have positive reinforcements from the society around them in their niche. This can lead to its own delusions but that is true at any level of confidence. When people do not have to prove themselves though it makes things easier and they have less cognitive stress. It is best to be in the mid-range of confidence where you do not feel the need to prove yourself to be superior nor control others when at the peak of a group hierarchy.

On Active Inference

Prof. BERT DE VRIES

Machine Learning Street Talk

Can IQ be increased?

IQ as a construct is about the ratio or proportion in the ability of humans to use memory in relation to other humans. So it is like height, there is no perfect measure of height but we can say with rough estimation that we have one in ten, one in a hundred, in a thousand, in a million, and one in a billion compared to the rest of humans.

Intelligence is about ideas and the ability to manipulate data about them. This is developmental in some aspects. Children grow in the ability to hold data in their heads as they form associations and evaluate what is real, good bad, and true. But as per the construct they do so a certain rates. 

Abstractions allow connections between ideas to find higher ideas that are not obvious to others. This allows us to formulate what is new and can be thought to expand the horizon of what is possible. Only it is that tests do not measure it effectively.

So what is this ability that humans can be categorized in? It is on tests computation. Yes, it is the case that abstractions of abstractions exist and are necessary for higher-order thought so we can also say many layers of abstraction exist relatively in the same way we can say an amount of computation exists relatively as well. It is just that if we combine computations and meta-abstraction we get, on principle, a way to tell what intelligence really is.

In computational IQ terms, When a person encounters new data and new problems it may be they can solve them but they do so within a category of the same number of persons who can do so. A person may be able to hold in their heads 9 variables at once. This is about one in five people. Or they can hold 25 variables at once making a comparison between all of them at the same time. This is one in one hundred million persons who can do so.

The difference is not much (9 or 25 variables) but it is a comparison between individuals on what they can do and this is only in computation as I said. A person who can also abstract to a high degree can have ideas beyond what is within their computation limit but what matters is that if they can be improved it will not be as fast as others can, meaning relatively if all persons grew together one in five would remain one in five.

It is more difficult to expand computational capacity than it is to learn new abstraction layers and simply easier to grow fast if your computational capacity is high. Abstraction can grow fast when we work hard to learn and create new things but when it comes to computation it may require increasing the perceptual field faster than relativistic speeds to increase IQ.

IQ vs Giftedness

You can be gifted and have low IQ, vice versa.

Giftedness is more personality trait than IQ.
A disposition of sorts.

Intelligence is three things:

working memory
stored memory
speed

but these are just about the bandwidth or the ability to compute

The one thing about giftedness is in the meta part or abstraction.

because human intelligence is about symbolism.

representation of concepts and ideas

there can always be more and more layers to thoughts:

Philosophy of God

Religion in my opinion is somewhat sophist because you can say schizos believe in God so anyone who is believing in God thinks God can change causality. When God creates causality the schizo thinks God can suspend causality. It is my whole argument that God has a purpose for suffering. I cannot think evil exists unless God has some kind of handicap preventing God from preventing suffering. So hell is not real and no other notion that God does things to make us suffer for no reason is real either. I believe that all things are only qualia and nothing else, just qualia and rules they obey.

I have said if we can separate mind and matter then they are not possible to interact with each out. Only mind exists and if only mind exists then only mind can interact with mind. God, in my opinion, as I believe, is the ground of being, it is all being not matter at all.

The real issue is how casualty is possible, which is that interactions by what God allows is the case that transportation happens, nothing moves without God so if God is not evil he can move things to stop babies from having cancer so the handicap must be in place if God is not evil. God cannot violate certain rules/algorithms except by a limited means. God can only transport particles within a limited range when the conditions are set but all particles are qualia regardless, not matter.

My conclusion is:

God transports qualias at certain ranges under certain conditions and that is why suffering can happen. Matter does not exist and schizos think either they are God or God can do anything and this can only mean, if true, God enjoys suffering. I do not believe God enjoys suffering so I don’t believe in a non-handicapped God. God being handicapped in what he can transport is the only solution to the problem of evil.

If everything is just qualia, every particle is just a piece of qualia, then when God teleports them and all things are made of it then God is pretending to be the universe the same way you pretend to see things yet are not those things. And God is aware of all things because God is moving all things (all qualias) God is hidden because we do not see God in all things for that reason, God only moves what he can in the way he can not the way he cannot. My being an agent can move but it is not solipsist. My view is that God moves and we move and we move together so as to interact. I can push on God as God can push on me. but this teleporting is only possible if my qualia happens to want to go in a direction and that requires me to learn what is good and bad. There is no reason to exist as a creature unless we seek to learn good and bad or we would be statues.